Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Comment: Talison lithium deal

July 16, 2010 - 00:00 GMT

KEYWORDS: Talison , lithium , brine , Salares Lithium , Atacama , spodumene , lithium carbonate , electric vehicles

Lithium deal is as much about attracting investment as it is long term security

The biggest surprise has been Talison’s decision to enter the brine industry – this is a significantly different business from mining and refining spodumene. Talison doesn’t sell lithium chemicals – such as lithium carbonate and hydroxide – but rather the feedstock concentrates to chemical companies.

Just ask Chemetall GmbH and SQM SA why they don’t own mines* – the two leading carbonate producers are chemical not mining companies.  (*This is mines in the traditional sense. The facilities in the Atacama are esentially a plumbing system of pumps and wells).

The titanium industry is an apt comparison: in a mature and established industry, only two chemical makers (titanium dioxide producers) own feedstock mineral mines. This is in an industry which produces 6m. tpa of titanium dioxide compared with the 60-80,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate produced last year.

The reason: different business fundamentals.

The...

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.


subscribe to this feed Comment & analysis

  • COMMENT: Glenstrata still has to break the mould

    The news that Glencore and Xstrata are in merger talks would only come as a surprise to someone living under a rock, and only then if said rock did not contain any valuable minerals. But now that talks of a tie-up of the world’s largest metals trader and its fourth largest miner have finally moved into the boardroom, hypothetical questions have become real, and the answers are far from certain.

  • APEX FULL YEAR 2011: Base metal forecasts: astounding accuracy

    Astounding upon astounding: that is how the 2011 leaderboard for Apex, the Metal Bulletin service that tracks the performance of over twenty top base metal price forecasters, appears when you consider it coldly.

  • Raising fees could imperil LME date structure: a broker writes

    The London Metal Exchange plans to introduce a fee for client trades from March. The proposal has aroused some opposition, and prompted one broker to write to Metal Bulletin, requesting anonymity. Here he outlines his concerns. How justified are they? Email aharrison@metalbulletin.com, or tweet @aharrison_mb

Upcoming Events