Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher

Price Briefing August 2010

July 27, 2010 - 00:00 GMT

KEYWORDS: China , rare earths , fluorspar , barytes

Future clouded by Chinese restrictions

This is a reaction to the announcement by the Chinese authorities on quotas will consolidate these gains and prices look set to rise further in the second half of the year, the big question is by how much.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce is cutting the export quota for rare earths by 72% in the second half of 2010, compared with the same period in 2009. It brings the total rare earths available for export in 2010 down to 30,529 tonnes which represents a 40% drop over the 2009 total of 50,145 tonnes (IM 09 July 2010 China slashes rare earth exports).

This tightening of supply from China will come as no surprise, although the severity of the cut in quotas is more than expected, and will spur the development of rare earth projects outside China.

Fifteen years ago, China supplied 35% of global demand, now this figure...

All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.


subscribe to this feed Comment & analysis

  • COMMENT: Glenstrata still has to break the mould

    The news that Glencore and Xstrata are in merger talks would only come as a surprise to someone living under a rock, and only then if said rock did not contain any valuable minerals. But now that talks of a tie-up of the world’s largest metals trader and its fourth largest miner have finally moved into the boardroom, hypothetical questions have become real, and the answers are far from certain.

  • APEX FULL YEAR 2011: Base metal forecasts: astounding accuracy

    Astounding upon astounding: that is how the 2011 leaderboard for Apex, the Metal Bulletin service that tracks the performance of over twenty top base metal price forecasters, appears when you consider it coldly.

  • Raising fees could imperil LME date structure: a broker writes

    The London Metal Exchange plans to introduce a fee for client trades from March. The proposal has aroused some opposition, and prompted one broker to write to Metal Bulletin, requesting anonymity. Here he outlines his concerns. How justified are they? Email aharrison@metalbulletin.com, or tweet @aharrison_mb

Upcoming Events